Implant for Knee and Hip Repair in French West Indies

knee_surgery

As more and more people in the Western World are walking around with artificial hips and knees,  French West Indies aging baby boomers are also leading the way.

That is partly because excess weight is fraying their joints earlier.

Between the years 2000 and 2006, knee replacements shot up by 65 percent.

In an AAOS 2009 paper entitled, “Joint Replacement Access in 2016: A Supply Side Crisis,” Dr. Thomas K Fehring et. al. stated that “demand for arthroplasty is expected to double in 10 years.”

By 2016, this translates into an annual demand of 1,046,000 knee replacement procedures.

At the same time, the expected supply of Orthopaedic surgeons is expected to fall such that if they were to work at current rates, they will only be able to perform 287,759 knee replacements, leaving many “waiting in pain”.

Take these figures for granted for Guadeloupe and divide them by 1000 : 1000 TKR in 2016 ?

Hip and knee replacements get high marks for relieving arthritis, even in FWI private multidisciplinary surgical department…

Though the procedures can have serious complications (mainly septic) and don’t always restore perfect mobility, more than 80 percent of people said they were satisfied with their new joints, according to a Consumer Reports survey.

And since then, advances in pain control and rehabilitation have sped recovery.

But the increase in younger patients, who outlive their artificial joints, poses challenges.

Manufacturers have engineered new implants that last longer in the laboratory than traditional ones, but none has been tested long enough to know how they will perform beyond 10 or 20 years in real life.

Yet the implants, as well as several controversial surgical procedures, have been heavily advertised to consumers and rapidly accepted into practice.

Why good joints go bad

joint_problems

The most common cause of hip and knee damage is osteoarthritis, which means the erosion of cartilage between the joints that allows adjoining bones to rub together.

Joints damaged by rheumatoid arthritis, a less common but more serious disorder, can be replaced as necessary when medical treatment has failed.

The need for joint replacement can often be delayed by the use of pain relievers, losing excess weight, and by doing regular low-impact exercises such as tai chi.

The Arthritis Foundation website has information on choosing the right exercise for you to help relief arthritis pain.

But when the damage is advanced, joint replacement becomes a good option.

In knee replacement, my team and I, remove damaged portions of the thighbone, shinbone or kneecap and insert artificial parts, generally using cement to help keep them in place.

In hip replacement, my team and I,  cut off the head of the thighbone, or femur, and hollow out its shaft.

Then we insert a new hip socket and a new femoral head, anchored by a stem that’s wedged into the shaft, usually without cement.

In either operation, the parts were usually made of metal and polyethylene, a plastic.

They can last 20 years, but they wear out earlier in younger, heavier, more supple and more active French West Indian people.

The most common reason hip and knee implants fail is loosening.

As metal and plastic rub together, the friction wears away the surfaces, creating tiny plastic particles around the joint.

The body attempts to remove those particles but in the process removes bone as well, causing the implant to loosen.

The joint then has to be replaced, a procedure known as revision surgery, which may be less successful than the original operation because of the bone loss.

New parts for old bones

Manufacturers have addressed the loosening problem by developing new devices.

But each has drawbacks.

Many patients base their choice on advertising.

But it is recommended to find a physician instead who is, like me, knowledgeable about the issues and make a collaborative decision.

Metal on highly cross-linked polyethylene Metal on metal Ceramic on ceramic
Use Knees and hips. Hips only. Hips only.
Plus This new plastic wears substantially less than conventional polyethylene. It wears less than metal on plastic, and offers a larger femoral head, reducing the chance of dislodgment. It’s likely to wear out the slowest.
Minus It has a shorter track record and might be more prone to fracture. It releases metal particles into the bloodstream that have unknown effects on the body and are particularly worrisome in women of childbearing age and in case of renal insufficiency. Moreover, a few patients have developed allergies to the metal debris. It poses a rare but serious risk of chipping or breaking. Moreover, up to 7 percent of patients have complained of squeaky ceramic hips.
Advice It offers durability with the fewest side effects, making it the best choice for most people. But because the knee puts greater demand on the joint, increasing the risk of fracture, physicians generally recommend metal on conventional polyethylene for knee replacements. This kind of device might make sense for young men in need of hip replacement whose work involves heavy labour, which increases the risks of joint dislocation and wear. This might be an option for patients who need to get many decades out of their hip, such as very young men, or women of childbearing age.

A smaller cut ?

Some surgeons now use a technique called minimally invasive surgery, which might limit damage to muscle and tissue.

The potential advantages are faster recovery and reduced pain – but at the cost of longer operative time and a high risk of surgical errors, including incorrect implant positioning, nerve injury, and bone fracture.

The benefits of the procedure are still being debated, but marketing claims have fuelled patient demand.

Many surgeons feel they need to offer it or they’ll lose patients to someone else.

But the scientific evidence that this technique makes a substantial difference is lacking.

In fact, improvements in pain control and rehabilitation appear to speed recovery in hip-replacement patients whether they have small or conventional incisions, according to a 2007 study published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Physicians note the same effect in knee patients.

Many surgeons now use “mini” cuts that are significantly smaller than traditional incisions but large enough for them to view the operating field.

Physicians support that approach because it provides most of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery without compromising safety.

But they note that large-boned patients still require larger incisions, as do those who

  • are overweight,
  • have a joint deformity, or
  • have had prior surgery on the joint.

Hip resurfacing

Aimed at younger patients who want to delay total hip replacement, this procedure removes only the damaged joint surfaces.

The socket is replaced with a metal cup and the femoral head is shaved down and covered by a metal cap anchored by a short stem.

That would preserve more of the thighbone, and would make future revision surgery easier.

“Patients read marketing materials and want this procedure. But the appeal of preserving bone can lead to false expectations.”

Women who had resurfacing are twice as likely to need early revision than those receiving regular hip implants, chiefly due to femoral neck fractures.

Women might be at higher risk for such fractures because their bones are smaller and weaken at menopause.

Additional concerns include the complexity of the operation and metal-on-metal debris.

Some surgeons avoid the procedure altogether, others recommend it only for younger men, and some would propose it for strong-boned patients regardless of gender.

Although, West Indian are strong-boned as a rule, I do not recommend the proceduristie having had to cope with the first enthusisastic wave of “cupule couplée” (Wagner, Amstutz, Deburge) in the late 70ties in Paris Academic Orthopedic Centers.

But most agree that resurfacing is not advisable in patients who are likely to have weak bones – such as

  • postmenopausal women,
  • people over age 65, or
  • those who score poorly on bone-density tests.

Partial knee replacement

In this procedure, I replace only the eroded side of the knee.

Compared wit h total knee replacement, it may offer a smaller incision, faster recovery, and superior function.

Moreover, it might buy patients 10 to 15 years before they need total knee replacement.

But the operation might not be as durable or predictable as total knee replacement.

In the same British study, which looked at more than 80,000 knee patients, early revision rates were twice as high for those who had partial knee replacement, especially among younger patients.

Common reasons for failure include loosening and arthritis in other parts of the knee.

“Partial knees are great in the right person. But only one in 20 people who need knee replacement are candidates.”

Patients should have

  • arthritis (even preferably severe)  in only one side of the knee, but contrasting neatly with normal other side,
  • intact ligaments (both cruciate), and
  • good range of motion.

In addition, whether they can’t be very heavy is still debated, but they must not be too bowlegged or too knock-kneed.

Early (?) Diagnosis of Low-symptomatic Ceramic Acetabular Liner Fracture in Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

"Catastrophic" failure of one-piece ceramic liner without major trauma in a very active and heavy patient

"Catastrophic" failure of one-piece ceramic liner without major trauma in a very active and heavy patient also having controlateral hip disease and right total knee arthroplasty (asymetric squatting) AND right shoulder arthroplasty for advanced omarthosis with normal rotator cuff (sugar cane handpicking ?)

Alumina ceramics in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been used in Europe since 1970.

Over the years, ceramic-on-ceramic coupling became a valid option in THA because of excellent biocompatibility and tribological properties.

The major disadvantages are possible squeaking and mainly risk of breakage, usually disclosed by pain and functional impairment.

Squeaking is an audible noise arising from ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, the incidence of which is reported to range from 1% to 7% of THAs.

Component positioning, stripe wear, and edge loading have all been implicated.

Clicking sounds and scratching have also been anecdotally described.

Breakage of a ceramic component due to brittleness of the material still seems a rare complication.

Trauma, high activity level, and obesity may increase the risk of fracture.

Defective ceramic manufacture, inadequate (sandwich with polyethylene) implant design, and errors in surgical technique may contribute to breakage.

Rather than Caucasian, Asian (by extension West Indian) population lifestyle, including squatting, kneeling, and possibly sitting cross-legged, has been correlated to liner rim impingement and fracture.

Additional reports concerning failure of various, mainly sandwich, but not exclusively, ceramic liners have recently been described.

I will describe here a unique case of apparently early diagnosis of a low-symptomatic fracture of an Anca-Fit acetabular liner occurring 3 years after implantation of an uncemented ceramic-on-ceramic modular THA.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: my own still skeptic’s view

Contemporary metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is the third attempt by its proponents to eliminate a diaphyseal femoral component.

Although one of my Deburge Cupule couplée probably  had one of the longest survival in Pr Cauchoix’ Orthopedic Department (Paris), during the seventies, I had at that time, to live through the second big and universal flop of the Gerard Double Cupule, Deburge Cupule couplée, Wagner  and Amstutz Cups and so on.

So, I still have multiple objections with the resurfacing concept and my earlier parisian experience makes me believe even the premises for the use of resurfacing invalid.

My own experience confirms a high rate of success with circumferential bead or mesh-coated or HAP uncemented stemmed femoral components at 10 to 20 years and there have been no long-term adverse consequences of femoral stress shielding with a diaphyseal component.

More acetabular bone may be removed with resurfacing, negating its “conservative” premise. One computer simulation suggested the range of hip motion might be considerably less with resurfacing compared with conventional hip arthroplasty.

There are a very limited number of patients for whom hip resurfacing is truly indicated, and the femoral head may be unsuitable for resurfacing in 40% of selected patients.

Resurfacing is technically more difficult than conventional hip arthroplasty.

Early complications and revision for femoral neck fractures are more likely with resurfacing.

Blood and urine metal ion levels, capsular lymphocytic aggregation, and hypersensitivity are concerns with metal-on-metal articulation.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing should only be used by a limited number of hip surgeons.

Although bone (sea, sex and sun) is usually of very good quality in FWI,  risks and complications of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing possibly outweigh any possible advantages.

Surgery for FWI avascular necrosis of the femoral head

Numerous treatment modalities are available for avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

There seems to be no relevant animal model for the study of the human form of this disease.

Also, numerous are the etiologies for this disease.

Results of treatment are often based on small patient series with different stages of the disease various etiologies and different techniques.

One of the (many) purposes of this blog is to provide a current FWI perspective of the various treatment modalities for avascular necrosis based on a comprehensive analysis of the literature and the author’s experience.

Obesity and osteoarthritis in knee, hip and/or hand

This study supports that obesity is an independent weak risk factor for hand OA.

None of the analyses give any indication of an association between BMI and hip OA.

On the other side, this study also confirms that obesity is an important risk factor for development of knee OA.

The future research agenda should focus on how community action programmes focusing on obesity may impact occurrence of OA (primary and secondary prevention) and symptom improvement in patients with existing OA (tertiary prevention).

Published in: on May 27, 2009 at 5:00 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , , ,

Bilateral femoral neck fractures due to transient osteoporosis of pregnancy

 Figure 1. Antero-posterior radiograph of the pelvis post partum.

Figure 1. Antero-posterior radiograph of the pelvis post partum.

Figure 1. Antero-posterior radiograph of the pelvis post partum.

Figure 2. T1 weighted coronal MRI scan of the pelvis post partum.

Figure 2. T1 weighted coronal MRI scan of the pelvis post partum.

Figure 2. T1 weighted coronal MRI scan of the pelvis post partum.

Figure 3. Antero-posterior radiograph of the pelvis post fixation with dynamic hip screws.

Figure 3. Antero-posterior radiograph of the pelvis post fixation with dynamic hip screws.

Figure 3. Antero-posterior radiograph of the pelvis post fixation with dynamic hip screws.

Transient osteoporosis of pregnancy (TOP)

Transient osteoporosis of pregnancy (TOP) is a rare, idiopathic self-limiting condition typically associated with the third trimester of pregnancy.

It almost always affects a single hip although bilateral presentation and involvement of the knee have been reported [1-3].

TOP usually presents with a sudden, quite severe onset of unilateral groin pain with no history of trauma.

The patient may be unable to walk, or may have an antalgic gait.

Pain is elicited by hip rotation, although a full range of motion is common.

Radiographs are avoided in pregnancy where possible, and are a poor investigation for demonstrating early osteopaenia.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) reveals low signal intensity of bone marrow on T1 weighted images, and high signal on T2 weighted images suggestive of bone marrow oedema[4].

The natural history is of resolution of symptoms over the course of 3 to 6 months

Hip fracture secondary to TOP

Hip fracture secondary to TOP is very rare with only 12 reported patients in the literature to date; in two cases the hip fractures were bilateral[2,3,5-8].

The majority of these fractures were caused by a traumatic event.

Atraumatic hip fractures secondary to TOP are even more unusual and are easily overlooked and hence may present to the orthopaedic surgeon at a late stage, making management more challenging.

Musculoskeletal complaints are very common in pregnancy.

The position and weight of the gravid uterus alters the centre of gravity and loading patterns of the axial and appendicular skeleton, whilst hormonal changes lead to joint laxity, and fluid retention may cause neural compression[9].

The majority of musculoskeletal complaints are not serious, and are managed conservatively without a specific diagnosis.

Pregnant women frequently complain of hip or pelvic pain.

The differential diagnosis includes some serious problems that need to be excluded, namely

  1. transient osteoporosis,
  2. osteonecrosis and
  3. pubic symphysiolysis.

Conventionally ionising radiation is avoided during pregnancy although Brodell et al. suggested that in the third trimester of pregnancy the benefits of adequate investigation of hip pain may outweigh the minimal risks[5].

MRI during pregnancy

There is no conclusive evidence that MRI has deleterious effects, however the safety of MRI has yet to be definitively proven[10].

It is in common use in the third trimester of pregnancy where clinically indicated[11] and is generally considered to be safe[12].

MRI has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of occult hip fracture[13] and can reliably distinguish between osteonecrosis and transient osteoporosis[4], making it the investigation of choice for hip pain in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Displaced intracapsular fractures have a high incidence of non-union and avascular necrosis[14].

It has however been shown that the risk of non-union is independent of bone quality[15] therefore in young patients with high value hips internal fixation should be the goal.

References

1.

Lloyd JM, Lewis M, Jones A: Transient osteoporosis of the knee in pregnancy.
J Knee Surg 2006, 19:121–123. [PubMed]

2.

Aynaci O, Kerimoglu S, Ozturk C, Saracoglu M: Bilateral non-traumatic acetabular and femoral neck fractures due to pregnancy-associated osteoporosis.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008, 128:313–316. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

3.

Munker R, Niedhart C, Niethard FU, Schmidt-Rohlfing B: [Bilateral fracture of the femoral neck following transient osteoporosis in pregnancy].
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2007, 145:88–90. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

4.

Takatori Y, Kokubo T, Ninomiya S, Nakamura T, Okutsu I, Kamogawa M: Transient osteoporosis of the hip. Magnetic resonance imaging.
Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, :190–194. [PubMed]

5.

Brodell JD, Burns JE, Heiple KG: Transient osteoporosis of the hip of pregnancy. Two cases complicated by pathological fracture.
J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989, 71:1252–1257. [PubMed]

6.

Cohen I, Melamed E, Lipkin A, Robinson D: Transient osteoporosis of pregnancy complicated by a pathologic subcapital hip fracture.
J Trauma 2007, 62:1281–1283. [PubMed]

7.

Fokter SK, Vengust V: Displaced subcapital fracture of the hip in transient osteoporosis of pregnancy. A case report.
Int Orthop 1997, 21:201–203. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

8.

Wood ML, Larson CM, Dahners LE: Late presentation of a displaced subcapital fracture of the hip in transient osteoporosis of pregnancy.
J Orthop Trauma 2003, 17:582–584. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

9.

Smith MW, Marcus PS, Wurtz LD: Orthopedic issues in pregnancy.
Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008, 63:103–111. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

10.

Nagayama M, Watanabe Y, Okumura A, Amoh Y, Nakashita S, Dodo Y: Fast MR imaging in obstetrics.
Radiographics 2002, 22:563–580. [PubMed]

11.

De Wilde JP, Rivers AW, Price DL: A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus.
Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005, 87:335–353. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

12.

Garcia-Bournissen F, Shrim A, Koren G: Safety of gadolinium during pregnancy.
Can Fam Physician 2006, 52:309–310. [PubMed]

13.

Lubovsky O, Liebergall M, Mattan Y, Weil Y, Mosheiff R: Early diagnosis of occult hip fractures MRI versus CT scan.
Injury 2005, 36:788–792. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

14.

Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE: Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports.
J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994, 76:15–25. [PubMed]

15.

Heetveld MJ, Raaymakers EL, van Eck-Smit BL, van Walsum AD, Luitse JS: Internal fixation for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. Does bone density affect clinical outcome?
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:367–373. [PubMed] [CrossRef]

Total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis performed for septic arthritis

I just think of  a quite recent total hip arthroplasty for bilateral spontaneous hip arthrodesis in maximum extension and adduction in a bamboo spine spondylarthritic young man.

I take this opportunity to review my experience of  total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip arthrodesis performed because of septic arthritis.

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip arthrodesis is an uncommon and challenging operation : however subsequent to tuberculosis, I witness  very impressive results I have in two cases of women, one 77 years old with arthrodesis 70 years earlier and another one 83 years old with very stiff hip from TB 45 years before and surgical bamboo spine from Hibbs procedure just after world war II.

The task would appear to be even more difficult if the arthrodesis is performed because of septic arthritis due to the theoretical risk of recurrent infection.

Women or men, left hip seems more often fused.

All of the patients have arthrodesis for sepsis: either subsequent to tuberculosis or subsequent to septic arthritis (Staphylococcus aureus ).

I examine the impact of the initial arthrodesis (surgical technique, position, leg length) on neighboring joints and indications for de-fusion.

Mean age is menopausis (range 32-83) and on average, the patients had a fixed hip for three and a half decades (range 7-70).

Revision surgery is performed via a posterolateral approach sometimes with trochanterotomy  or via an anterolateral approach.

Implantation uses cemented implants, press fit implants, or  hybrid implants (cemented cup and press fit stem).

Clinical assessment at last follow-up notes pain, walking capacity and joint motion.

Leg length discrepancy is measured and complications noted.

The position of the original arthrodesis was considered satisfactory (flexion 20̊, adduction 0-10̊, external rotation 0-20̊) for less than half of  the hips.

Leg length discrepancy is 4 cm (2-8 cm).

Neighboring joints involved concerned the lumbar spine in most patients, the ipsilateral knee in a majority  patients, as well as the contralateral knee and the contralateral hip.

The decision to remove the arthrodesis is based on functional needs related to lumbar pain, the homolateral or the controlateral knee, limping and leg length discrepancy, or an operation on the ipsilateral knee.

After surgery, 4 out of 5 hips are free of pain with improvement or relief (Hibbs fusion case) of the lumbar pain and pain of the homolateral knee and/or the contralateral knee.

One third of the patients walks without support but nearly all still have a limp.

Mean flexion is 75̊.

Leg length discrepancy is 2.5 cm on average and less than half of the patients has balanced limbs.

The postoperative period is uneventful for a majority of the patients (rare paresia of the common fibular nerve, rare femoral phlebitis, rare early infection).

Among late complications are noted: nonunions of the greater trochanter, recurrent ankylosis and loosenings.

Earlier history of infection does not appear to be a contraindication for implantation of a total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis.

Despite the long recovery period and the modest gain in joint motion, 4 out of  5 patients are satisfied after endeavouring their blocked hip for 35 years on average.

Key words : Hip, ,

Complications of prophylactic pinning for unilateral upper femur epiphysis slipping

The appropriate treatment for unilateral slipping of the upper epiphysis of the femur is controversial.

Prophylactic surgical treatment raises the risk of bilateralization.

The procedure is often unnecessary as the natural history of epiphyseal slipping is often favorable when the displacement is minimal.

Analyzing the complications of systematic prophylactic treatment may help to determine the optimal attitude.

In retrospective series of children who undergo surgery for unilateral slipping of the superior femoral epiphysis, prophylactic treatment of the healthy hip may be instituted systematically.

The complications may be noted according to Paley.

Have to be searched for factors of risk of complications, bone maturity indexes, the characteristic features of the healthy femur epiphysis and surgical technique used.

Complications follow prophylactic treatment even after material removal.

The rate of complications may reach 10% :

  • minor complications (local infections with favorable outcome, pain in the hip at mobilization, totally resolved at one year),
  • moderate complication (spiral fracture of the upper femur starting from the screw head, treatable with plate fixation with favorable outcome) and
  • severe complication: osteoarthritis of the hip joint with early onset septicemia and unfavorable outcome with necrosis of the femoral head, resection, use of a spacer, and at one year, total hip arthroplasty was performed.

Complications may be globally more frequent and more severe in some series using prophylactic screwing.

A major infection complication (osteoarthritis) observed in one series has not been reported elsewhere.

There may be  a center effect since may be recruited all of the most complex cases in one region.

Identifying any factor predictive of complications may be difficult.

There may be no clear choice between systematic prophylactic treatment and careful surveillance.

A usual,  prophylactic treatment in selected patients (no ugly “protocol” please) might be the key to a successful preventive approach.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.