- The controversy regarding optimal thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty continues to focus on the risk-to-benefit ratio of various anticoagulants.
Considering the variable efficacy and risks of bleeding, infection, and wound complications associated with anticoagulation after total knee arthroplasty, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has offered me clinical practice guidelines on the prevention of symptomatic pulmonary embolism : this took place for me, as I attend the AAOS Annual Meeting San Francisco in Feb 2008.
The practice guidelines emphasize the following points:
(1) arthroplasty surgery is different now than it was fifteen years ago and older studies should not be used to create guidelines,
(2) the available literature since 1996 shows no significant differences in the rate of symptomatic pulmonary embolism with the use of low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, or mechanical devices and aspirin alone,
(3) the body of literature is underpowered and fails to provide considerable evidence because of the rarity of symptomatic or fatal pulmonary embolism after arthroplasty, and
(4) the risk of major bleeding should be a consideration when selecting the method of thromboprophylaxis after arthroplasty.
I conducted a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials focusing on venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery.
I included all randomized controlled trials that were cited by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines and also added two trials that were excluded by the ACCP because they did not provide venographic data.
Pooled data analysis was utilized in the review, and the rates of
- symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis,
- symptomatic pulmonary embolism,
- fatal pulmonary embolism,
- major operative-site bleeding,
- and major non-operative-site bleeding
were specifically calculated.
I found, on the basis of the pooled data, that aspirin is effective for decreasing the number of venous thromboembolism events after major orthopaedic surgery.
This conclusion resulted from the Pulmonary Embolism Prevention trial that was excluded from the ACCP analysis because of the lack of venographic data.
I also found that while
- warfarin,
- low-molecular-weight heparins,
- and pentasaccharides
increase the risk of operative-site bleeding events across pooled data, there was no reduction in
- symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis,
- pulmonary embolism,
- or fatal pulmonary embolism.
The author also identified the methodological flaws that undermine the ACCP guidelines:
(1) the exclusion of any randomized studies that did not utilize venographic outcome assessments,
(2) the failure to require relevant clinical outcomes such as symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, fatal pulmonary embolism, and major bleeding complications for inclusion in their analysis,
(3) the failure to quantitatively analyze the incidence of these relevant clinical outcomes from randomized trials,
and (4) potential conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies for six of seven members of the drafting committee.
Furthermore, the ACCP guidelines adhere to strict inclusion criteria requiring outcomes assessment with venography or duplex ultrasound.
This criterion is based on their claim that asymptomatic deep-vein thromboses lead to post-thrombotic syndrome and cause morbidity after major orthopaedic surgery.
However, without any Level-1 prognostic outcome studies demonstrating post-thrombotic syndrome after asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis following arthroplasty or hip fracture surgery, the ACCP guidelines are reduced to expert opinion.
